Why freshers aren't getting jobs in 2026, and what actually helps
TAP Academy Team·28 August 2026
If you graduated this year without an offer, you have probably read two completely contradictory things about the job market, both published in the same month.
One says hiring has collapsed. The other says companies are hiring in large numbers and cannot find people. Neither is wrong. Understanding why they are both true is the difference between spending a year applying to everything and spending four months fixing the thing that is blocking you.
The two facts that seem to contradict each other
Start with the discouraging one. A survey of more than 37,000 students conducted in January and February 2026 found that around 85% of engineering students had not yet received a job offer. In the same survey, 87.8% of HR leaders said they were actively hiring and 90% were maintaining or increasing their hiring budgets. Outlook Business
That 85% figure gets quoted everywhere, usually stripped of the detail that makes it meaningful. It was measured in the middle of an academic year, and the question was whether students had received an offer yet. It is a snapshot of a placement season in progress, not a final outcome, and anyone telling you 85% of engineers never get hired is misreading it.
Now the encouraging one. Fresher hiring on Naukri grew 8% year on year in June 2026 and 9% across the April to June quarter, even while IT sector hiring overall fell 3%. The industry body’s own review projects the tech sector reaching about 6 million people in FY26, a net addition of 135,000. Naukri NASSCOM
The individual companies bear this out. TCS hired over 44,000 freshers in FY26 and made 25,000 fresher offers for FY27. Infosys hired more than 20,000 and expects a similar number this year. Cognizant hired 20,000 entry-level graduates in 2025, and its chief executive pushed back on the collapse narrative directly: “There was a little bit of fearmongering from reading about the fact that there’s going to be a collapse of jobs. I think there will be more jobs.” Angel One Outlook Business Fortune
So the resolution is not that one side is lying. Hiring is happening, and it has become selective rather than stalled. A selective market feels like a closed one if you are on the wrong side of the filter.
The scale problem underneath all of it
India produces roughly 1.5 million engineering graduates a year. Forbes India
Against that, the numbers above are small. TCS, Infosys and Cognizant together offering roughly 65,000 fresher seats is meaningful, and it is also about four percent of one year’s graduating class. Even in a healthy market, most graduates were never going to be absorbed by the big services firms. That competition has always been there. It has recently got sharper.
Why nobody agrees on how employable graduates are
You will see wildly different employability figures quoted at you, and the gap between them is not a rounding error.
Mercer-Mettl’s India Graduate Skill Index put overall graduate employability at 42.6%, down from 44.3% the previous year. Its assessment covered more than 2,700 campuses and over a million students. Mercer ThePrint
The India Skills Report 2026, a separate study run with CII, AICTE and AIU, puts engineering employability at 70.15% and computer science graduates at 80%. It draws on over one lakh candidates taking a different assessment. Careers360
Both are real studies. They measure different populations on different tests and arrive at answers nearly twice apart, which is a useful reminder that “employability” is a test result rather than a fact about you. The practical takeaway is not to pick the flattering number. What both tests are probing, whether you can do the work on day one, is what the market is now filtering on.
What changed in entry-level hiring
Three shifts overlap here, and each one makes the next harder to absorb.
The routine work that fresher jobs were built from is being automated. An EY analysis, as reported by Rest of World, estimates Indian IT services companies have cut entry-level roles by 20 to 25% because of automation and AI. The same report describes a student at IIITDM Jabalpur where fewer than a quarter of his 400 classmates had offers. Rest of World
We have written separately about what AI has and has not done to software jobs, including the evidence that the decline is concentrated in entry-level work. The tasks a fresher used to be hired for while learning everything else, writing boilerplate, chasing routine bugs, filling in unit tests, are the tasks the tools absorbed first.
Training a fresher is also expensive, which makes it the first cost to defer. A fresh graduate needs around nine months of training before being deployable on a project, while an experienced hire contributes immediately, and TCS cites exactly this in explaining its demand-linked hiring strategy. Angel One
That single fact explains most of what you are experiencing. When margins tighten, a nine-month investment is the easiest line to postpone. It also points at the fix, because the gap being deferred is one you can close yourself before you apply.
The third shift is that the pyramid itself is being redrawn. Across India’s top five IT services firms, total headcount fell by 6,981 in FY26, a reversal from an increase of 12,718 the year before. TCS chairman N Chandrasekaran told the company’s 2026 AGM that the firm will eventually have as many AI agents as employees, and that the industry is “unlikely to hire the same number of people”, while adding that the transition “will create many more opportunities” requiring “new kinds of talent”. Business Standard Business Standard
Put together, those three add up to fewer seats, filled more carefully, with a higher expectation of what you can do on arrival.
The filters companies describe
The same survey that produced the 85% figure asked the hiring side what they look for. 64% of HR leaders said they now define top talent through capability in AI and machine learning, data, and cloud. 57% are using AI for screening and profile matching, and 55% are running AI-driven interviews. Outlook Business
LinkedIn’s 2026 skills research found 74% of Indian recruiters struggle to find qualified talent while 38% of Indian jobseekers feel unprepared for how fast required skills are changing. Both numbers describe the same gap from opposite sides. Storyboard18
There is a pay signal pointing the same way. Deloitte’s campus survey found cybersecurity and robotics commanding 10 to 20% premiums in campus placements, with 87% of engineers surveyed actively upskilling, while campus salaries overall rose just 3.91% in FY25. Deloitte
The salary expectations gap
Part of what reads as “no jobs” is a mismatch between what graduates expect and what entry-level roles pay. In the same 37,000-student survey, 73% of undergraduates were targeting salaries above ₹5 LPA, and only 40% reached that mark. 39% of engineering graduates ended up below ₹7 LPA. Business Today
None of which means you should take whatever is offered. It does mean a large share of people who describe themselves as unable to find a job are, more precisely, unable to find a job at the number they had in mind. The first offer is a starting point rather than a ceiling, and the first switch after eighteen months to two years is usually the largest single jump of an early career.
From the people going through it
Statistics describe the shape of this market. The posts below, from a public forum, describe how it feels from inside it. They are individual accounts, not measurements, so read them for texture and not for how common anything is.
An engineer who reviewed 30 fresher resumes for a single intern role wrote: “every resume read like the same person wrote it. And I think that person was ChatGPT… The worst part is i couldn’t figure out what anyone actually DID.” Reddit
A 2026 computer science graduate described the drift that produces that resume: “Throughout college I just went with the flow and ended up lost. No show-stopping projects or skill specialization, even though my degree claims I have an AI specialization.” Reddit
And on chasing job titles rather than skills, a commenter’s blunt advice to a student targeting AI roles: “Stop picking up skills like they’re pokemon. Pick a niche. Companies aren’t looking for Nvidia or Google certified code monkeys… They’re looking for people who can identify, diagnose and solve problems.” Reddit
What helps
The evidence above points at a fairly specific response, and it is not the obvious one.
Applying harder does not fix a filtering problem. If your applications are being screened out, sending three hundred more of the same produces three hundred more rejections. Recruiters are screening for evidence you can contribute early, and volume is not evidence. Collecting certificates does not fix it either, because Deloitte’s data attaches premiums to demonstrated capability in specific areas, not to course completion counts. A certificate says you attended. An interviewer is trying to find out what you can do.
What does move things is closing the nine-month gap yourself. The cost companies are deferring is the cost of making you deployable, so turn up already deployable: the fundamentals interviews test, meaning data structures, algorithms and SQL, plus a backend framework, plus projects you can defend under questioning, plus AI tooling used the way working teams use it. Stated plainly that is the whole gap, and it takes months rather than weeks.
Being able to explain your work matters more than having more of it. The recruiter above could not tell what any of thirty candidates had done. One project you can walk through in detail, including what broke and what you would change, is worth more than five listed on a line.
It also pays to widen where you look. The services giants are the most visible employers and the most competitive. Product companies, global capability centres and smaller firms hire fewer people each but collectively account for a lot of hiring, and they are less crowded than the drive everyone in your college is preparing for.
This is a harder market than the one your seniors entered. It is not a closed one, and the graduates getting through are the ones who can show they will be useful before the training budget is spent on them.
